Woke!1!
- Ustvarjalec teme tomi
- Začetni datum
Ha. Točno to. To sem že večkrat opazil pri teh naših domačih najbolj zagretih in tečnih "antirasistih". Do črncev se dejansko obnašajo pokroviteljsko. Kakor do osebe s posebnimi potrebami, ki mu je treba stalno nekaj pomagat. Zanimivo mi je tudi kako te antirasiti v Sloveniji na vsak način želijo biti prijatelji z vsakim črncem, ki pride mimo.. prav vsiljivo...in potem dejansko nadlegujejo nekega črnca na nekem javnem prostoru, da bi ja vsi prisotni videli kako je kool, ker se pogovarja s črncem. A uni revež samo želi svoj mir. Najboljše jim je pa, če jim uspe kakšnega črnca prepričat, da se druži z njimi. Potem ga pa vlačijo okoli samo zato, da vsem sporočajo, lejte me, nisem rasist imam prijatelja črnca... Sem takim nekoč rekel, da je ravno to kar počnejo rasizem.. ja itak, da sem bil deležen polno sočnih psovk.
rES ne VEm kAKo wOKe iDEolOGijA ŠkoDUje (prosto po lef.tardih) - med drugim tudi z vzbujanjem slabe vesti (bolj) odgovornim/vestnim/boljšim staršem naprimer:
According to a professor at the University of Warwick in England, parents who read to their kids should be thinking about how they’re “unfairly disadvantaging other people’s children” by doing so.
In an interview with ABC Radio last week, philosopher and professor Adam Swift said that since “bedtime stories activities . . . do indeed foster and produce . . . [desired] familial relationship goods,” he wouldn’t want to ban them, but that parents who “engage in bedtime-stories activities” should definitely at least feel kinda bad about it sometimes: “I don’t think parents reading their children bedtime stories should constantly have in their minds the way that they are unfairly disadvantaging other people’s children, but I think they should have that thought occasionally,” he said.
But Swift also added that some other things parents do to give their kids the best education possible — like sending them to “an elite private school” — “cannot be justified” in this way. “Private schooling cannot be justified by appeal to these familial relationship goods,” he said.
#related# ”It’s just not the case that in order for a family to realize these intimate, loving, authoritative, affectionate, love-based relationships you need to be able to send your child to an elite private school,” he continued, adding that “we could prevent elite private schooling without any real hit to elite family relationships.”
At one point, Swift even flirted with the idea of “simply abolishing the family” as a way of “solving the social justice problem” because “there would be a more level playing field” if we did, but ultimately concluded that “it is in the child’s interest to be parented” and that “parenting a child makes for what we call a distinctive and special contribution to the flourishing and well-being of adults.”
www.nationalreview.com
Professor: If You Read To Your Kids, You’re ‘Unfairly Disadvantaging’ Others
Bedtime-story privilege?According to a professor at the University of Warwick in England, parents who read to their kids should be thinking about how they’re “unfairly disadvantaging other people’s children” by doing so.
In an interview with ABC Radio last week, philosopher and professor Adam Swift said that since “bedtime stories activities . . . do indeed foster and produce . . . [desired] familial relationship goods,” he wouldn’t want to ban them, but that parents who “engage in bedtime-stories activities” should definitely at least feel kinda bad about it sometimes: “I don’t think parents reading their children bedtime stories should constantly have in their minds the way that they are unfairly disadvantaging other people’s children, but I think they should have that thought occasionally,” he said.
But Swift also added that some other things parents do to give their kids the best education possible — like sending them to “an elite private school” — “cannot be justified” in this way. “Private schooling cannot be justified by appeal to these familial relationship goods,” he said.
#related# ”It’s just not the case that in order for a family to realize these intimate, loving, authoritative, affectionate, love-based relationships you need to be able to send your child to an elite private school,” he continued, adding that “we could prevent elite private schooling without any real hit to elite family relationships.”
At one point, Swift even flirted with the idea of “simply abolishing the family” as a way of “solving the social justice problem” because “there would be a more level playing field” if we did, but ultimately concluded that “it is in the child’s interest to be parented” and that “parenting a child makes for what we call a distinctive and special contribution to the flourishing and well-being of adults.”
Professor: If You Read To Your Kids, You’re ‘Unfairly Disadvantaging’ Others | National Review
According to a professor at the University of Warwick in England, parents who read to their kids should be thinking about how they’re “unfairly disadvantaging other people’s children” by doing so. …
www.nationalreview.com
Za ljubitelje te teme, odličen pilot. 
Razkriva banalnosti woke kulture in cancel culture :
Miniserija
www.imdb.com
Razkriva banalnosti woke kulture in cancel culture :
Miniserija
Douglas Is Cancelled (TV Mini Series 2024) ⭐ 7.0 | Comedy, Drama
Douglas Is Cancelled: Created by Steven Moffat. With Hugh Bonneville, Karen Gillan, Alex Kingston, Nick Mohammed. The story focuses on a respected news presenter whose career is threatened after he makes an ill-advised joke.
www.imdb.com
rES ne VEm kAKo wOKe iDEolOGijA ŠkoDUje (prosto po lef.tardih) - med drugim tudi z že velikokrat omenjenim omejevanjem svobode govora kar te dandanes v Angliji lahko zelo hitro pripelje v resne težave:
9gag.com
Woman In London Is Attacked By A Migrant, When The Police Shows Up And Threaten To Arrest Her Because She Called Him A 'Filthy Migrant'
Woman In London Is Attacked By A Migrant, When The Police Shows Up And Threaten To Arrest Her Because She Called Him A 'Filthy Migrant' - Video
13,863 points • 1,750 comments
"she didn’t get threatened with jail though, they just said stop calling him a filthy migrant (actually the guy claimed she’d been swearing and the woman didn’t correct him so presumably what started the altercation was “filthy fucking migrant”). Idk seems kinda reasonable that a policeman would object to it."
"provide source.
what actually happened. did migrany attakc her with knife, or just insulted. or maybe she called random dude filthy migrant and insulted guy attacked her for that reason.
I need fucking facts or i call any of these shit bullshit.
i am not going to spreas fucking propaganda so opposite side cant slap me with facts that i am completely wrong because i trusted random retard on 9gag"
"What do you mean by "attacked"?
It probably means he was minding his own business and British Karen started to shout at him because he's a "Filthy migrant".
Check the shit before judge."
"provide source.
what actually happened. did migrany attakc her with knife, or just insulted. or maybe she called random dude filthy migrant and insulted guy attacked her for that reason.
I need fucking facts or i call any of these shit bullshit.
i am not going to spreas fucking propaganda so opposite side cant slap me with facts that i am completely wrong because i trusted random retard on 9gag"
"What do you mean by "attacked"?
It probably means he was minding his own business and British Karen started to shout at him because he's a "Filthy migrant".
Check the shit before judge."
Long story short - ne glede na to kaj porečejo domači in tuji fašisti ter če see osredotočimo na zgolj vsebino videoposnetka - v Angliji v javnosti ne smeš uporabljati besedne zveze "umazan migrant" saj ti to lahko nakoplje težave. In to je direktna posledica debilne woke mentalitete. In to sploh ni prvi tak primer, da imajo ljudje resne težave zaradi izražanja lastnega mnenja, ki sploh ni dejanski sovražni govor (pa pustimo nerealne woke deefinicije sovražnega govora).
Seveda, seevedam, kakopak. Poanta, ki je jasno očitna iz videoposnetka in zaradi katerega sem link do posnetka tudi nalepil je to, da ima posameznik lahko več kot očitno težave s policijo zgolj zaradi javno izrečenega izraza "umazan migrant". Dopuščam pa možnost, da ste nekateri za določeni zadeve še vedno pač povsem slepi in tega tako kot še marsičesa drugega enostavno ne opazite ali pa "ne opazite".
Ja, lahko da "tlačijo glavo v pesek", lahko pa da oseba ob pogledu na isto stvar zadevo dejansko dojema drugače. Podobno recimo kot pred leti, ko so eni videli uboge begunce, ki si s potjo čez del ali pa kar celo Evropo rešujejo življenje, drugi pa ilegalne ekonomske migrante, ki si z nelegalnimi prehodi želijo zgolj izbolšati svoje (ne več ogroženo) življenje kar je sicer povsem za razumet ampak za take zadev pač obstajajo drugačna pravila kot pri dejanskemu reševanju golega živjenja. In tudi tu je politična korektnost oz. woke mentaliteta odigrala veliko vlogo saj med drugim je že od samega začetka onemogočala, da se reče bobu bob.
