Boeing 747 zletel s steze

Ytbnd

Guru
2. mar 2010
16.832
5.933
113

Alaska Airlines Flight Was Scheduled for Safety Check on Day Panel Blew Off​


A day before the door plug blew out of an Alaska Airlines flight on Jan. 5, engineers and technicians for the airline were so concerned about the mounting evidence of a problem that they wanted the plane to come out of service the next evening and undergo maintenance, interviews and documents show.
But the airline chose to keep the plane, a Boeing 737 Max 9, in service on Jan. 5 with some restrictions, carrying passengers until it completed three flights that were scheduled to end that night in Portland, Ore., the site of one of the airline’s maintenance facilities.
Before the plane could complete that scheduled sequence of flights and go in for the maintenance check, the door plug blew out at 16,000 feet, minutes after embarking on the second flight of the day, from Portland to Ontario International Airport in California.
The plane landed safely and no one was seriously injured, but the incident focused new attention on Boeing’s manufacturing processes and the safety procedures followed by airlines.

The scheduling of the maintenance check on the plane has not previously been reported. It demonstrates that the airline chose to keep the plane in service while it made its way toward the maintenance facility rather than flying it to Portland without passengers.
Alaska Airlines confirmed the sequence of events. But the airline said the warnings it had on the plane did not meet its standards for immediately taking it out of service.



Za kaj je šlo ?

Tu so več napisali

It became known shortly after the accident that Alaska Airlines had concerns about the use of the jet. Accordingly, Alaska Airlines decided to no longer use the aircraft for long-haul flights following warnings from the cabin pressure system. However, it was not yet public that the airline had already scheduled a safety check for the plane.



The airline said the warnings did not meet the threshold for conditions that would require the plane to be removed from service immediately. Apparently a warning light from the cabin pressure system came on twice within ten days - but decisive action was only planned when it came on three times.


Po koncu taistega dne bi moralo letalo v delavnico na pregled.
 

Matey

AlterZavarovalničar
6. sep 2007
33.773
15.836
113
a04mBPZ_460swp.webp
 

Ytbnd

Guru
2. mar 2010
16.832
5.933
113
Boeing je eden večjih lobistov v Zda, posledično ima 40% vseh prihodkov vezanih na poslovanje z državo, da so tesno zlizani z zda vlado ni nobena teorija zarote

od 9:14
so 9 na listi lobistov, ki so največ "donirali", in sicer $ 342 548 310
 

SJTV1

eV12
18. jul 2007
19.193
1.199
113
www.adriamedia.si
Po navadi ne gledam takih videov (ker uspe v 10 min povedat tisto, kar se da prebrat v 1 minuti), tega sem začel, pa nehal po par minutah,. Vsi trije omenjeni incidenti na začetku so ... dva stvar vzdrževanja, eden zgleda človeška napaka.
Pa daleč od tega, da bi zagovarjal Boeing, ampak tale video je ena sama solata. Mimogrede, Boeing ni lobist, ampak ima najete lobiste.
 

Ytbnd

Guru
2. mar 2010
16.832
5.933
113
tomato, tomejto

Saj sem dal timestamp za relevantno.

In kdo je priskrbel tistih $ 342 548 310 ?
Boeing ali najeti lobisti ?
 

ferdo

Guru
3. sep 2007
10.548
3.896
113
Ljubljana
hmpg.net
Mimogrede, Boeing ni lobist, ampak ima najete lobiste.
No shit Sherlock.

Nobena firma v USA ni lobist, razen lobističnih. Vse najemajo lobiste, In ne boš verjel, enako je v Slovenihji. Recimo Huawei ni lobist. Franci je. Ampak - Francija plaća Huawei, da dela kaj?
 

SJTV1

eV12
18. jul 2007
19.193
1.199
113
www.adriamedia.si
No shit Sherlock.

Nobena firma v USA ni lobist, razen lobističnih. Vse najemajo lobiste, In ne boš verjel, enako je v Slovenihji. Recimo Huawei ni lobist. Franci je. Ampak - Francija plaća Huawei, da dela kaj?
Hja, v postu z videom je pisalo, da je Boeing 9 največji lobist. Pa ni.