Rusi v Siriji
- Ustvarjalec teme Pac_Man
- Začetni datum
In kako so prišli do ugotovitev? So šli na teren v Sirijo?
Preberi si sledeče: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ghouta_chemical_attack
Khan al-Assal attack = http://www.bbc.com/news/world-middle-east-22424188
Za katerega je bilo ugotovljeno, da so ga izvedli uporniki. Uporniki pa so pred tem zavzeli kar nekaj orožja sirske vojske in posledično tudi njihove zaloge Sarina.
Uporniki so 2x uporabili Sarin in pri tem hoteli obtožiti Assada.
Povej mi, bi Assad uporabil Sarin med tem, ko je imel pri sebi preiskovalce UN-a ravno zaradi Sarina? Misliš, da je butast?
Nazadnje urejeno:
Nate nisem niti pomislil, zato sem pisal v množini (si tudi del Alter - teama) in odgovarjal sem na tvoj post.
Aja, zdaj me bo pa že računalnik ocenjeval
Se pravi odprem temo "Kvačkanje pletenje" in v njo napišem, da je Damjan Murko car.
Temo bo pogledal samo en uporabnik in stisnil "spam". In zato izgubil kredibilnost.
Pa sorry za tale spam v temi.
Tole dol bo še veselo oz. lahko odločujoče glede svetovne prevlade.
Vladimir ni šel tja ponavljat zgodovine "pušenja" iz 80 - desetih.
Proti njemu je Obama navaden pussy, samo ni sam.
During the UN inspection team's visit in August 2013, a large-scale chemical weapons attack outside of Damascus occurred, shifting the inspection team's focus. U.S., UK, French, and German intelligence services concluded that the Assad regime was responsible for the attacks, accusations which were supported by the UN inspection team's report. [14] Subsequent diplomatic pressure by the U.S. and Russia resulted in Syria joining the Chemical Weapons Convention (CWC) and agreeing to disarmament of its chemical weapons stockpiles with a deadline of 30 June 2014. [15] OPCW teams were dispatched to Syria to destroy chemical weapons and related production equipment.
Ja mislim,da je butast
Ja mislim,da je butast
Mislim da si kr ti... Pa tudi vztrajno lazes....
UN Ghouta Area report[edit]
Main article: Report on the Alleged Use of Chemical Weapons in the Ghouta Area of Damascus on 21 August 2013
The UN investigation into the chemical attacks in Ghouta was published on 16 September 2013. The report stated that "the environmental, chemical and medical samples we have collected provide clear and convincing evidence that surface-to-surface rockets containing the nerve agent Sarin were used in Ein Tarma, Moadamiyah and Zamalka in the Ghouta area of Damascus."[17](p8)[29] U.N. Secretary General Ban Ki-moon called the findings "beyond doubt and beyond the pale,” and a clear evidence of a war crime. "The results are overwhelming and indisputable." Ban stated a majority of the blood samples, environmental samples and rockets or rocket fragments recovered tested positive for sarin.[114] The report, which was "careful not to blame either side," said that during the mission's work in areas under rebel control, "individuals arrived carrying other suspected munitions indicating that such potential evidence is being moved and possibly manipulated .
Ja, Assad je povabil UN v kontrolo kemicnega orozja potem je pa 3 dni pozneje par km od UN ekipe uporabil kemicno orozje....
, accusations which were supported by the UN inspection team's report
O really, ceprav v porocilu pise kontra
UN Ghouta Area report[edit]
Main article: Report on the Alleged Use of Chemical Weapons in the Ghouta Area of Damascus on 21 August 2013
The UN investigation into the chemical attacks in Ghouta was published on 16 September 2013. The report stated that "the environmental, chemical and medical samples we have collected provide clear and convincing evidence that surface-to-surface rockets containing the nerve agent Sarin were used in Ein Tarma, Moadamiyah and Zamalka in the Ghouta area of Damascus."[17](p8)[29] U.N. Secretary General Ban Ki-moon called the findings "beyond doubt and beyond the pale,” and a clear evidence of a war crime. "The results are overwhelming and indisputable." Ban stated a majority of the blood samples, environmental samples and rockets or rocket fragments recovered tested positive for sarin.[114] The report, which was "careful not to blame either side," said that during the mission's work in areas under rebel control, "individuals arrived carrying other suspected munitions indicating that such potential evidence is being moved and possibly manipulated .
Ja, Assad je povabil UN v kontrolo kemicnega orozja potem je pa 3 dni pozneje par km od UN ekipe uporabil kemicno orozje....
, accusations which were supported by the UN inspection team's report
O really, ceprav v porocilu pise kontra
Potrebujes prevod?
Ban stated a majority of the blood samples, environmental samples and rockets or rocket fragments recovered tested positive for sarin.[114] The report, which was "careful not to blame either side," said that during the mission's work in areas under rebel control, "individuals arrived carrying other suspected munitions indicating that such potential evidence is being moved and possibly manipulated .
Potrebujes prevod? Pastirji v Siriji imajo zelo "prijateljev" ,ki imajo pri the zadevah ogromno izkusenj (pa tudi precej zalog).
Če koga zanima, malo bolj resno, kaj se dogaja na vojaškem področju med NATOm in Rusijo, še posebej trenutno v Siriji, si lahko prebere članek... http://breakingdefense.com/2015/09/russians-in-syria-building-a2ad-bubble-over-region-breedlove/ -- Russians In Syria Building A2/AD ‘Bubble’ Over Region: Breedlove ...
Ne, teleportirajo taksen zadeve. Gre za topshit hi-tech orozje, kajnede.
Meanwhile, the latest UN report released in June 2013 confirms several allegations of chemical weapons attacks but concludes it:
“… has not been possible, on the evidence available, to determine the precise chemical agents used, their delivery systems or the perpetrator.”
Further complicating the matter, Dave Gavlak, a veteran Middle East correspondent for Associated Press, cites interviews with “doctors, Ghouta residents, rebel fighters and their families” who believe that “certain rebels received chemical weapons via the Saudi intelligence chief, Prince Bandar bin Sultan, and were responsible for carrying out the gas attack.”
Meanwhile, the latest UN report released in June 2013 confirms several allegations of chemical weapons attacks but concludes it:
“… has not been possible, on the evidence available, to determine the precise chemical agents used, their delivery systems or the perpetrator.”
kakšna preciznost in to so ugotovili 2 meseca PRED napadom. Sem že kdaj v življenju videl kakšno raketo in vem,kaj je 330 milimetrov in ne,ne moreš je prenašat naokoli. Recimo jugoslovanski Orkan je imel kaliber 262-kako pa raketa izgleda vidiš na wikiju.
“… has not been possible, on the evidence available, to determine the precise chemical agents used, their delivery systems or the perpetrator.”
kakšna preciznost in to so ugotovili 2 meseca PRED napadom. Sem že kdaj v življenju videl kakšno raketo in vem,kaj je 330 milimetrov in ne,ne moreš je prenašat naokoli. Recimo jugoslovanski Orkan je imel kaliber 262-kako pa raketa izgleda vidiš na wikiju.
A tebi ni jasno, da sta bila dva napada s sarinom? Prvi (on 19 March 2013) je bil potrjen, da je bi s strani upornikov:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Khan_al-Assal_chemical_attack
http://www.bbc.com/news/world-middle-east-22424188
Drugi pa 21 August 2013: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ghouta_chemical_attack
