Rusi v Siriji

uuu

Fizikalc
19. jun 2010
1.766
14
38
ZDA so "ranjena zver" (čeprav navzven to (še) ni tako očitno) in kot taka lahko naredi še veliko p*zdarijo.

Nastala je prav komična situacija, ko "demokratična" Amerika nasprotuje demokratičnim volitvam v Siriji,
medtem, ko se "enoumna" Rusija zanje zavzema.
Lahko si le predstavljamo, kakšen vtis to ustvarja v javnosti, tudi ameriški, ki se tudi že sprašuje, kaj je z njihovo družbo narobe ..

U.S. Demands There Be No Democracy in Syria

Jimmy Carter Is Correct That the U.S. Is No Longer a Democracy
 

Matey

AlterZavarovalničar
6. sep 2007
33.570
15.595
113
467716-post_slo.gif
 

Pac_Man

⋆Распут&
10. maj 2014
2.211
0
36
Dobri ste.

Iz navadnega diplomatskega blabla odgovora na vprašanje z redne tiskovke ste prišli do Rotschildov in NWO.

http://www.fmprc.gov.cn/mfa_eng/xwfw_665399/s2510_665401/t1321004.shtml

Citat:
Q: NATO Foreign Ministers decided during a meeting of the North Atlantic Council on December 2 to start negotations onMontenegro's accession. What is your comment?

A: We have noted relevant reports. NATO is a product of the Cold War. In the globalized era, the security of one country interconnects with and influences that of another. No country or group can seek its absolute security single-handedly. The international community should discard all forms of Cold War mindset, adopt the new concept of common, comprehensive, cooperative and sustainable security, and jointly build a just and fair security landscape that is shared by all.

BTW, taka organizacija obstaja. Reče se ji Združeni narodi. Ampak zaradi butastih vetov in par drugih problemov niso zmogli spravit v red niti par skreganih zemljakov na Balkanu.
 

Matey

AlterZavarovalničar
6. sep 2007
33.570
15.595
113
Citat:
Uporabnik Pac_Man pravi:
Dobri ste.

Iz navadnega diplomatskega blabla odgovora na vprašanje z redne tiskovke ste prišli do Rotschildov in NWO.

http://www.fmprc.gov.cn/mfa_eng/xwfw_665399/s2510_665401/t1321004.shtml

Citat:
Q: NATO Foreign Ministers decided during a meeting of the North Atlantic Council on December 2 to start negotations onMontenegro's accession. What is your comment?

A: We have noted relevant reports. NATO is a product of the Cold War. In the globalized era, the security of one country interconnects with and influences that of another. No country or group can seek its absolute security single-handedly. The international community should discard all forms of Cold War mindset, adopt the new concept of common, comprehensive, cooperative and sustainable security, and jointly build a just and fair security landscape that is shared by all.

BTW, taka organizacija obstaja. Reče se ji Združeni narodi. Ampak zaradi butastih vetov in par drugih problemov niso zmogli spravit v red niti par skreganih zemljakov na Balkanu.

Tole si verjetno malce falil temo, Rotschilde & NWO se v zadnje omenja v tvoji temi (Putinova Rusija, Putinstan,...)
smile-1.gif


Kar se pa veta tiče - si torej mnenja, da je veto nepotreben, morda nepotrebno omejujoč? Lahko odgovoriš kar tam, da bo kao bolj smiselno
smile-1.gif
 

Ytbnd

Guru
2. mar 2010
16.763
5.895
113
Organizacija ZN je brezzobi tiger in gojišče birokratov, na mednarodni sceni so pri reševanju problemov nekje na ravni društva kmečkih žena.
 

uuu

Fizikalc
19. jun 2010
1.766
14
38
Torej trdiš, da velekapital nima nobenega vpliva na dogajanja?

No ja, s kakšnimi $500 bilijoni ($500.000 milijardami) se menda že da kaj narediti ali meniš, da to nima nobene veze?
Pa dejstvo, da naprimer ameriški FED ni v državni lasti ZDA, ampak v privatni lasti in popolnoma pod kontrolo peščice zelo bogatih družin (Rothschild, Rockefeller ..) tudi ne?

Če k temu dodamo še nekaj splošno znanih dejstev, naprimer kdo in s kakšnim namenom je ustanovil Saudsko Arabijo v 30.letih prejšnjega stoletja in kdo Izrael, postanejo tudi dogajanja v tistem delu sveta bolj jasna .. brez poznavanja teh dejstev pa praktično brez vsakega smisla
 

uuu

Fizikalc
19. jun 2010
1.766
14
38
Lepo narisana organizacijska shema
evil.gif

v glavnem zaposlen kader, ki preklada mape in papirje in nima nobene besede, na ključnih položajih so pa nastavljeni "domači" in tudi strateške odločitve sprejemajo lastniki (kdo pa naj bi jih drugi, če ne lastniki)
 

Pac_Man

⋆Распут&
10. maj 2014
2.211
0
36
Kolikor razumem so "lastniki" 3400 bank članic. Odločitve pa sprejemajo tile

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Federal_Open_Market_Committee

Citat:
Janet Louise Yellen, Board of Governors, Chairman
William C. Dudley, New York, Vice Chairman
Stanley Fischer, Board of Governors
Lael Brainard, Board of Governors
Daniel K. Tarullo, Board of Governors
Jerome H. Powell, Board of Governors
Charles L. Evans, Chicago
Jeffrey M. Lacker, Richmond
Dennis P. Lockhart, Atlanta
John C. Williams, San Francisco

iz sveta guvernerjev in regionalnih podružnic.
 

Ytbnd

Guru
2. mar 2010
16.763
5.895
113
Drži se raje Motorole v Ukrajini, za vse ne moreš biti specialist.

Alan Greenspan
Federal Reserve President Says The Federal Reserve is a Private Corporation



Fed Reserve Bank: We don't have to tell you where the money went!
 

Pac_Man

⋆Распут&
10. maj 2014
2.211
0
36
Ali pač?

http://www.save-a-patriot.org/files/view/frcourt.html

Citat:
Federal reserve banks are not federal instrumentalities for purposes of a Federal Tort Claims Act, but are independent, privately owned and locally controlled corporations in light of fact that direct supervision and control of each bank is exercised by board of directors, federal reserve banks, though heavily regulated, are locally controlled by their member banks, banks are listed neither as "wholly owned" government corporations nor as "mixed ownership" corporations; federal reserve banks receive no appropriated funds from Congress and the banks are empowered to sue and be sued in their own names. . . .
 

uuu

Fizikalc
19. jun 2010
1.766
14
38
Citat:
Uporabnik Pac_Man pravi:
Ali pač?

http://www.save-a-patriot.org/files/view/frcourt.html

Citat:
Federal reserve banks are not federal instrumentalities for purposes of a Federal Tort Claims Act, but are independent, privately owned and locally controlled corporations in light of fact that direct supervision and control of each bank is exercised by board of directors, federal reserve banks, though heavily regulated, are locally controlled by their member banks, banks are listed neither as "wholly owned" government corporations nor as "mixed ownership" corporations; federal reserve banks receive no appropriated funds from Congress and the banks are empowered to sue and be sued in their own names. . . .

To drži, samo se je potrebno tudi vprašati, kdo so lastniki teh "member banks"?

Iz ust znanih ekonionistov sem tudi že slišal, da je že samo ime Federal Reserve čisto mimo, ker niso niti federalne, niti nimajo nobenih rezerv .. nastal je pa FED po tretjem poskusu, drugi poskus je namreč spodletel in ameriški predsednik Andrew Jackson je pred smrtjo na vprašanje, na kaj je v svojem mandatu najbolj ponosen, odgovoril: "Killed the Second Bank of the United States",
evil.gif


ON
malo smo sicer zašli, čeprav daljnosežno so to zelo povezane teme
smile-1.gif
 

Pac_Man

⋆Распут&
10. maj 2014
2.211
0
36
Citat:
Uporabnik uuu pravi:

To drži, samo se je potrebno tudi vprašati, kdo so lastniki teh "member banks"?

Delničarji.
smirk-1.gif


Za JPMorgan Chase, ki je bil v zgodovini znana v povezavi z družino Rockefeller, so podatki taki:

https://finance.yahoo.com/q/mh?s=JPM+Major+Holders

Izdanih je 3.68 milijarde delnic, takole na hitro jih ima največji lastnik, Vanguard whatever skladi, 213k. 0.006%.

https://finance.yahoo.com/q/ks?s=JPM+Key+Statistics

Za 68$ + trgovalni račun & provizija jih lahko kupiš tudi ti.