Pfizer doing SARS-COV2 Gain of Function

AndY1

Guru
Osebje foruma
18. sep 2007
22.095
4.090
113

FINAL REPORT: COVID Select Concludes 2-Year Investigation, Issues 500+ Page Final Report on Lessons Learned and the Path Forward​




COVID-19 ORIGIN: COVID-19 most likely emerged from a laboratory in Wuhan, China. The FIVE strongest arguments in favor of the “lab leak” theory include:

PROXIMAL ORIGIN PUBLICATION: “The Proximal Origin of SARS-CoV-2” publication — which was used repeatedly by public health officials and the media to discredit the lab leak theory — was prompted by Dr. Fauci to push the preferred narrative that COVID-19 originated in nature.

GAIN-OF-FUNCTION RESEARCH: A lab-related incident involving gain-of-function research is most likely the origin of COVID-19. Current government mechanisms for overseeing this dangerous gain-of-function research are incomplete, severely convoluted, and lack global applicability.

ECOHEALTH ALLIANCE INC. (ECOHEALTH): EcoHealth — under the leadership of Dr. Peter Daszak — used U.S. taxpayer dollars to facilitate dangerous gain-of-function research in Wuhan, China. After the Select Subcommittee released evidence of EcoHealth violating the terms of its National Institutes of Health (NIH) grant, the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services (HHS) commenced official debarment proceedings and suspended all funding to EcoHealth.

  • New evidence also shows that the Department of Justice (DOJ) has opened an investigation into EcoHealth’s pandemic-era activities.
NIH FAILURES: NIH’s procedures for funding and overseeing potentially dangerous research are deficient, unreliable, and pose a serious threat to both public health and national security. Further, NIH fostered an environment that promoted evading federal record keeping laws — as seen through the actions of Dr. David Morens and “FOIA Lady” Marge Moore.


SOCIAL DISTANCING: The “6 feet apart” social distancing recommendation — which shut down schools and small business across the country — was arbitrary and not based on science. During closed door testimony, Dr. Fauci testified that the guidance, “sort of just appeared.”

MASK MANDATES: There was no conclusive evidence that masks effectively protected Americans from COVID-19. Public health officials flipped-flopped on the efficacy of masks without providing Americans scientific data — causing a massive uptick in public distrust.

LOCKDOWNS: Prolonged lockdowns caused immeasurable harm to not only the American economy, but also to the mental and physical health of Americans, with a particularly negative effect on younger citizens. Rather than prioritizing the protection of the most vulnerable populations, federal and state government policies forced millions of Americans to forgo crucial elements of a healthy and financially sound life.

COVID-19 MISINFORMATION: Public health officials often spread misinformation through conflicting messaging, kneejerk reactions, and a lack of transparency. In the most egregious examples of pervasive misinformation campaigns, off-label drug use and the lab leak theory were unjustly demonized by the federal government.

  • The Biden Administration even employed undemocratic and likely unconstitutional methods — including pressuring social media companies to censor certain COVID-19 content — to fight what it deemed misinformation.
COVID-19 VACCINE: Contrary to what was promised, the COVID-19 vaccine did not stop the spread or transmission of the virus.

RUSHED COVID-19 VACCINE APPROVAL: The FDA rushed approval of the COVID-19 vaccine in order to meet the Biden Administration’s arbitrary mandate timeline. Two leading FDA scientists warned their colleagues about the dangers of rushing the vaccine approval process and the likelihood of adverse events. They were ignored, and days later, the Biden Administration mandated the vaccine.

VACCINE MANDATES: Vaccine mandates were not supported by science and caused more harm than good. The Biden Administration coerced healthy Americans into compliance with COVID-19 vaccine mandates that trampled individual freedoms, harmed military readiness, and disregarded medical freedom to force a novel vaccine on millions of Americans without sufficient evidence to support their policy decisions.

NATURAL IMMUNITY: Public health officials engaged in a coordinated effort to ignore natural immunity — which is acquired through previous COVID-19 infection — when developing vaccine guidance and mandates.

VACCINE INJURY REPORTING SYSTEM: Vaccine injury reporting systems created confusion, failed to properly inform the American public about vaccine injuries, and deteriorated public trust in vaccine safety during the COVID-19 pandemic.

ECOHEALTH OBSTRUCTION: EcoHealth President Dr. Peter Daszak obstructed the Select Subcommittee’s investigation by providing publicly available information, instructing his staff to reduce the scope and pace of productions, and doctoring documents before releasing them to the public. Further, Dr. Daszak provided false statements to Congress.

DR. DAVID MORENS: Dr. Fauci’s Senior Advisor, Dr. David Morens, deliberately obstructed the Select Subcommittee’s investigation, likely lied to Congress on multiple occasions, unlawfully deleted federal COVID-19 records, and shared nonpublic information about NIH grant processes with EcoHealth President Dr. Peter Daszak.
 
  • Wow
Reactions: javr

nemenabijat

bom jaz vas
7. feb 2011
4.464
3.572
113
Zakaj skrivajo podatke? Aja zato, ker je varno in učinkovito. :valjamse:

Cepljenčki, prihaja nova smrtonosna sezona virusnih oboljenj. Ste obnovili kode? Sigurno so vam že potekle. Aja, za korono se ne morete več cepit, ker grejo novo nabavljene pošiljke direkt v uničenje. Kako lahko to dopustite?
 

nemenabijat

bom jaz vas
7. feb 2011
4.464
3.572
113
Nomaš pojma, to je fejk, v resnici ti bodo dali nano robote in te nadzorovali, tvoje misli, tvoje sanje. Konec je s teboj.
Nano robote ste dobili v puhlo pamet vsi cepci. Za nadzor pa še kodo. :aplauz:
Res mate iq na sobni temperaturi. :aplauz:

Ps. Cepljen, vendar z orgonskimi topovi sem uničil nano robote v sebi in sedaj lahko širim resnico.

Si se pred novo sezono šel cepit? Pa ne spet s puhljico "virus ni več nevaren" opletat.
 

Garfildd

Guru
24. jul 2007
6.300
4.875
113
Zakaj skrivajo podatke? Aja zato, ker je varno in učinkovito. :valjamse:

Cepljenčki, prihaja nova smrtonosna sezona virusnih oboljenj. Ste obnovili kode? Sigurno so vam že potekle. Aja, za korono se ne morete več cepit, ker grejo novo nabavljene pošiljke direkt v uničenje. Kako lahko to dopustite?
Ne razumem komu to pišeš, saj smo vsi ki smo bili cepljeni v roku dveh let že umrli... zdravnikov tudi že zdavnaj ni več, ker so bili prvi cepljeni,
ostali so samo še zbujeni ljudje in življenje se je sedaj končno spravilo v red, vladata rd in harmonija :sprasujemse:
 
  • Haha
Reactions: bertoncl

javr

Guru
6. dec 2011
1.915
1.140
113
... zdravnikov tudi že zdavnaj ni več, ker so bili prvi cepljeni,
s čim?
recimo da izbruhne epidemija prehladu-gripi-pljučnici podobne bolezni za katero so ugotovili da jo povzroča virus.
Imaš na voljo izdelavo cepiva:
(1) po desetletja preizkušani metodi mrtvega ali oslabljenega virusa s prav tako desetletji izkušenj s stranskimi učinki, ali
(2) novo tehnologijo, preizkušeno na nekaj sto ljudeh, katerim so se stranski učinki merili 14 dni.
Kaj boš izbral, oz. zakaj ne (1)?

ok, pride na trg (2) ; uspešno si dokončal medicinsko fakulteto, imaš že kar nekaj let/desetletij praktičnih izkušenj z (1), o (2) nimaš pojma. Kakšna je tvoja reakcija? "O super, grem se takoj cepit, vsi, žena, otroci, starši, vsi !!"
ali raje
"Ga ni denarja na tem svetu da se grem cepit z eksperimentalnim cepivom."
?
 
2. jul 2020
5.217
6.731
113
s čim?
recimo da izbruhne epidemija prehladu-gripi-pljučnici podobne bolezni za katero so ugotovili da jo povzroča virus.
Imaš na voljo izdelavo cepiva:
(2) novo tehnologijo, preizkušeno na nekaj sto ljudeh, katerim so se stranski učinki merili 14 dni.
Kaj boš izbral, oz. zakaj ne (1)?

"Ga ni denarja na tem svetu da se grem cepit z eksperimentalnim cepivom."
?

Saj že tukaj dokazuješ, da niti ne veš o čem pišeš. Ta tehnologija novega cepiva je bila v razvoju od 90. let. Ti pišeš o nekih eksperimentalnih zadevah.

Saj proti vam paranoičnim znanstvenikom se ne da priti do dna. Občina cepiva (1) menda povzročajo avtizem, ta nova (2) povzročajo piščančje trakce v krvi. Pa kot pravi Andy, celo so našli nano-tehnologijo v njih... stranski učinki so pa čisto random. Enega je menda pobralo takoj, drugega 3 leta kasneje... majkemi.

Na koncu pa smo tu, da je covid nekakoma izginil, da bi ljudje potrebovali hospitalizacijo, tega ni več v enaki meri kot leta 2020. Preboleli in cepljeni imamo sedaj neko imunost.
 
  • Haha
Reactions: nemenabijat

bertoncl

Guru
4. jun 2015
1.817
643
113
Ne razumem komu to pišeš, saj smo vsi ki smo bili cepljeni v roku dveh let že umrli... zdravnikov tudi že zdavnaj ni več, ker so bili prvi cepljeni,
ostali so samo še zbujeni ljudje in življenje se je sedaj končno spravilo v red, vladata rd in harmonija :sprasujemse:

Ja ddddddd zdravniki so bili cepljeni z vodo al s fiziološko, a si pozabil? Naredi your own research! :valjamse: