Znanstveni članki

Citat:
Uporabnik jest5 pravi:

Citat:
Uporabnik jest5 pravi:
96 je odkritih ponarejenih ja. Pristranskih, vsaj delno prepisanih itd pa mnogo več.

btw, naturalnews?

Klikni za razširitev

Je mimo teme, samo sem se ob tej novički spomnil nate, kravakonj.
klik

Citat:
Bohannon je izvedel zanimiv eksperiment. Pripravil je članek o odkritju zdravilne učinkovite s protirakavim delovanjem, ki naj bi jo izoliral iz nekega lišaja. Isti članek je poslal 304 znanstvenim revijam, odgovorilo pa jih je 255. Od teh jih je 157 članek sprejelo v objavo, preostale pa so ga zavrnile. S člankom je bila le manjša težava - napisal ga je neobstoječi človek iz neobstoječega inštituta, v njem pa so bile tako osnovne in očitne napake, da bi ga moral zavrniti vsakdo, ki je opravil maturo iz biologije. Seveda istega članka ni mogoče poslati v več revij, zato je Bohannon spremenil ime človeka, ustanove, lišaja in spojine, sicer pa je članek ostal z enakimi metodološkimi napakami (napačna kontrola, neskladnost rezultatov z ugotovitvijo itn.) in v enako zanikrni angleščini (da ga ne bi izdala angleščina kot materni jezik, ga je najprej z Google Translate prevedel v francoščino in nazaj v angleščino, potem pa malenkostno popravil).

Klikni za razširitev

Polovica znanstvenih revij je bila pripravljena objaviti popolnoma izmišljeno raziskavo, izmišljenga človeka z izmišljenega inštituta.

Toliko o tem, kako so vse objavljene študije in članki zihr pravilni

Klikni za razširitev

Citat:
on the other end, discovered that the vast majority of his acceptances came from India and Nigeria.

Klikni za razširitev

Citat:
about one-third of the journals targeted in this sting are based in India — overtly or as revealed by the location of editors and bank accounts — making it the world's largest base for open-access publishing; and among the India-based journals in my sample, 64 accepted the fatally flawed papers and only 15 rejected

Klikni za razširitev

Citat:
Uporabnik Matey pravi:
Jpjp, kravakonj ima prav, saj njegove trditve podpirajo različni inštituti in ti lahko doda linke kot vir, tvojega logičnega dojemanja in razmišljanja pa ne moreš nikjer linkat tako da sorry, ti nimaš prav

Klikni za razširitev

Citat:
"These aren't really science journals pointed out by this very cute and clever hoax; they are more check-cashing operations," says Stanford University study-design expert John Ioannidis. "I don't think that open access is the problem either. I think you would see the same problem with the lower tier of traditional peer-review journals as well."

In fact, the hoax may show that scientists are caught in a double bind when it comes to publishing studies, Ioannidis says. His own research shows that the most prestigious science journals, ones important in hiring decisions for researchers, demand outsize effects from the studies they publish. That may lead to study authors subconsciously biasing their statistics to make a startling discovery worthy of a big-name journal.

Klikni za razširitev

Citat:
A striking picture emerges from the global distribution of open-access publishers, editors, and bank accounts. Most of the publishing operations cloak their true geographic location. They create journals with names like the American Journal of Medical and Dental Sciences or the European Journal of Chemistry to imitate—and in some cases, literally clone—those of Western academic publishers.

Klikni za razširitev

Citat:
About one-third of the journals targeted in this sting are based in India—overtly or as revealed by the location of editors and bank accounts—making it the world's largest base for open-access publishing; and among the India-based journals in my sample, 64 accepted the fatally flawed papers and only 15 rejected them. The United States is the next largest base, with 29 acceptances and 26 rejections.

Klikni za razširitev

Citat:
Journals published by Elsevier, Wolters Kluwer, and Sage all accepted my bogus paper. Wolters Kluwer Health, the division responsible for the Medknow journals, "is committed to rigorous adherence to the peer-review processes and policies that comply with the latest recommendations of the International Committee of Medical Journal Editors and the World Association of Medical Editors," a Wolters Kluwer representative states in an e-mail. "We have taken immediate action and closed down the Journal of Natural Pharmaceuticals."

Klikni za razširitev

Citat:
For authors submitting and publishing in Elsevier journals, we have established a number of agreements with funding bodies and institutions to help authors comply with open access policies [/url]

Klikni za razširitev

Citat:
Elsevier authors can now publish their research open access in over 1600 high quality, established subscription journals that support open access publishing.

Klikni za razširitev

Citat:
The Elsevier journal that accepted the paper, Drug Invention Today, is not actually owned by Elsevier, says Tom Reller, vice president for Elsevier global corporate relations: "We publish it for someone else."

Klikni za razširitev

Citat:
Uporabnik jest5 pravi:
V Indiji je 1/3 publikacij(celo sam si to napisal), open access pa so se izkazale le kot bolj ranljive, ne pa da je pošiljal le na open access.

Klikni za razširitev

Citat:
Tvoje trditve so bile, da so "vsi" znanstveni članki pravilni, ozeroma, da odkrijejo le 96 ponarejenih na miljon.

Klikni za razširitev

Citat:
A review of retractions in medical and biological peer-reviewed journals finds the percentage of studies withdrawn because of fraud or suspected fraud has jumped substantially since the mid-1970s. In 1976, there were fewer than 10 fraud retractions for every 1 million studies published, compared with 96 retractions per million in 2007.

Klikni za razširitev

Citat:
over and out

Klikni za razširitev

Citat:
To generate a comprehensive list of journals for my investigation, I filtered the DOAJ, eliminating those not published in English and those without standard open-access fees. I was left with 2054 journals associated with 438 publishers. Beall's list, which I scraped from his website on 4 October 2012, named 181 publishers. The overlap was 35 publishers, meaning that one in five of Beall's "predatory" publishers had managed to get at least one of their journals into the DOAJ.

I further whittled the list by striking off publishers lacking a general interest scientific journal or at least one biological, chemical, or medical title. The final list of targets came to 304 open-access publishers: 167 from the DOAJ, 121 from Beall's list, and 16 that were listed by both. (Links to all the publishers, papers, and correspondence are available online at http://scim.ag/OA-Sting.)

Klikni za razširitev