Pomoč pri magistrski nalogi

Tricky
Za eno slikco sem moral prav malo preveriti po googlu

Manjka omenjanje psevdoznanosti pod krinko prave znanosti znano kot (recimo) Funding bias.






Citat zadnjega linka:

"A pharmaceutical company paying for a study of a new depression medication, for example, might influence the study's design or interpretation in ways that subtly favor the drug that they'd like to market. There is evidence that some biases like this do occur. Drug research sponsored by the pharmaceutical industry is more likely to end up favoring the drug under consideration than studies sponsored by government grants or charitable organizations.4 Similarly, nutrition research sponsored by the food industry is more likely to end up favoring the food under consideration than independently funded research."

Na tak, biased, način tudi tisto, kar bi moralo biti resna znanost, postaja psevdoznanost. In ko se te, "znanstvene" laži, obelodanijo, postanejo temelj za raznorazne fejsbuk "znanstvenike". Med slednjimi namreč nastane prepričanje, da je vsa prava znanost zaradi obelodanjenih biased raziskav laž.

Zanimiva anketa. Ko bo zaključena me zanima tvoj komentar rezultatov.

Na faxu vas ne učijo več, da dolgočasnih anket noben ne reši do konca?
Ko začneš krneka vprašanja pisat v neomejenih količinah folk zgubi veselje in ugasne vse skupaj. No ta je lep primerek tega.
Pa brez zamere.